It seems that recently ousted, failed U.S. President B. Hussein Obama’s “Deep State” Government runs even deeper than previously stated (sorry for that).
Many are still wondering why the FBI paid British agent Christopher Steele to investigate Donald Trump. This was especially suspicious, considering the Clinton team had previously paid Steele to probe Trump.
Now, Sen. Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is trying to figure out the truth behind all of this.
The Washington Examiner reported that Grassley just sent a letter to FBI Director James Comey demanding the story behind the FBI’s reported plan to pay the author of a lurid and unsubstantiated dossier on candidate Donald Trump. Grassley specifically focused on FBI’s deputy director, Andrew McCabe, indicating Senate investigators want to learn more about McCabe’s role in a key aspect of the Trump-Russia affair.
“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends,” Grassley wrote in a letter to Comey.
He then called for the FBI to turn over all its records relating to Steele and the dossier, in addition to “all FBI policies, procedures, and guidelines applicable when the FBI seeks to fund an investigator associated with a political opposition research firm connected to a political candidate, or with any outside entity.”
Grassley pointed out that McCabe is already under investigation by the FBI’s inspector general for playing a top role in the Hillary Clinton email investigation even though McCabe’s wife accepted nearly $700,000 in political donations arranged by a close Clinton friend, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, for her run for state senate in Virginia.
“While Mr. McCabe recused himself from public corruption cases in Virginia…he failed to recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation,” Grassley wrote, “despite the appearance of a conflict created by his wife’s campaign accepting $700,000 from a close Clinton associate during the investigation.”
What do you think about this? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.